Differentiating Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome from recurrent optic neuritis: a case report and review of the literature concerning Hispanic patients

Abstract

Background

First recognized at the beginning of twentieth century and named after three authors who independently described some affected patients, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome is a rare multisystemic autoimmune disease targeting melanin-containing tissues of the eye, meninges, inner ear and skin. It predominantly affects Asian people, but also people with darker skin pigmentation such as Native Americans and Hispanics (Mestizos), whose ancestors moved from Asia across the Bering strait to North America and further down to Central and South America. Heterogenous presentation is observed, especially among different ethnic groups. Here we describe the case of an Hispanic South American patient presenting with multiple visual relapses and thus mimicking recurrent optic neuritis; we provide insights into the differential diagnosis and a brief review of the literature concerning the epidemiology of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome in Hispanic patients compared with other ethnic groups.

Case presentation

A 34-year-old Ecuadorian woman presented over years with multiple relapses involving the visual system. She was investigated in both neurologic and ophthalmic clinical settings. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging, cerebrospinal fluid examination, Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Fluorescein Angiography were performed. She was misdiagnosed first as an optic neuritis pointing to a demyelinating disorder, then as a posterior scleritis. Due to the protean manifestations of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome and the incomplete clinical presentation at the beginning, the right diagnosis was made only at a later disease stage using retrospective criteria.

Conclusions

Hispanic patients often present without extraocular symptoms in early phases of the disease and they have globally lower rates of intertegumentary signs compared to Asian patients. The diagnosis of a multisystemic disease such as Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome is a challenge involving specialists operating in different medical fields; especially in urban multiethnic populations, rare etiologies of common symptoms have to be taken into account when performing a differential diagnosis.

Background

First recognized at the beginning of twentieth century and named after three authors who independently described some affected patients [1], Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) is a rare multisystemic autoimmune disease targeting melanin-containing tissues of the eye, meninges, inner ear and skin [2]. It predominantly affects Asian people, but also people with darker skin pigmentation such as Native Americans and Hispanics (Mestizos), whose ancestors moved from Asia across the Bering strait to North America and further down to Central and South America [3, 4]. Genetic susceptibility is linked to certain HLA alleles, the most relevant being HLA-DRB1*0405, which has been reported as the predominant allele across different ethnic groups [5]. The typical age of incidence is between 20 and 50 years, and women are affected twice than men. The most prominent feature of VKH is bilateral uveitis, accompanied by various combinations of neurological, auditory and cutaneous signs and symptoms. The typical disease course includes four phases (prodromic, uveitic, convalescent and recurrent/chronic), with very protean clinical manifestations [6]. New diagnostic criteria take into account such clinical variability [7].

Case presentation

A 34-year-old Ecuadorian women was referred to our hospital for sudden loss of vision and pain in her right eye, immediately followed by the same symptoms in the left eye. At presentation bilateral visual impairment with a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/200 in the right eye and 20/60 in the left eye was detected. Ophthalmoscopic examination revealed optic nerve head edema without any other sign of inflammation. The patient was hence referred to the neurological ward with a diagnose of “bilateral papilledema – suspected optic neuritis (ON)”. Here, she underwent neurological examination, brain and spinal cord Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), lumbar puncture (LP) and autoantibodies testing (anti AQP4 and anti-MOG) to rule out a demyelinating disease of the Central Nervous System (CNS). Neurological examination and MRI resulted within normal limits. Autoantibodies testing was negative. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination showed a mild pleocytosis in the absence of oligoclonal bands (OCBs). She was treated with a short-term steroid therapy and discharged with the diagnosis of “bilateral ON with liquor pleocytosis”.

Six years later, another episode of sudden loss of vision and pain in the left eye occurred, and the patient was admitted to the ophthalmology ward for worsening symptoms. She underwent a complete ophthalmological examination, including Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) and Fluorescein Angiography (FA). SD-OCT revealed a large exudative retinal detachment (ERD) at the posterior pole in the left eye and bilateral choroidal folds (Fig. 1). FA showed optic disc hyperfluorescence during late phases of the angiogram as well as multiple areas of leakage in the left eye (Fig. 2). A work-up for posterior uveitis was hence performed. Blood tests for infectious diseases commonly causing uveitis (herpetic viruses, syphilis, borreliosis, tuberculosis) were negative as well as autoantibodies (ANA, ASMA, ANCA, anti-dsDNA, ENA) screening. A complete neurological evaluation was then repeated; this time CSF examination was normal, with neither pleocytosis nor OCBs, while MRI of the eyes and orbits revealed a scleroretinal thickening with enhancement in the posterior chamber of the left eye. According to these findings the disease was labelled as “probable posterior scleritis (PS)”. A three-days high-dose intravenous steroid treatment was started, followed by slow oral taper in the following months. The patient improved both clinically and instrumentally.

Fig. 1

Combined Near Infrared Reflectance (NIR) (a) and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) (b) of the left eye performed during a disease recurrence occurred six years after the first presentation. The white arrow crossing NIR image corresponds to the position of the SD-OCT scan. Multiple pockets of fluid accumulation (white asterisk) detaching the neuroretina are visible as dark gray areas (encircled by white dotted lines) on NIR and as empty spaces on SD-OCT. Choroidal folds are also clearly visible in both the images (white arrowheads)

Fig. 2

Fluorescein angiography (FA) of the left eye performed during a disease recurrence occurred six years after the first presentation. Images of the posterior pole (a) during the late phases of the angiogram reveal leakage of dye from the optic nerve head (white arrowhead) demonstrating the inflammatory status. Multiple leaking points (black arrowheads) feeding a pocket of subretinal fluid (encircled by white dotted lines) are visible along the supero-temporal vascular arcade (b)

A year and a half later, the patient came to our attention complaining of loss of vision in the right eye, accompanied by headache, neck stiffness, slight subjective left hearing loss and tinnitus. At funduscopic examination, optic nerve head edema was detected in the right eye (Fig. 3). The relapsing nature of the condition along with the protean clinical manifestations of the disease through the years raised the suspect of VKH disease. The medical history of the patient was hence retrospectively investigated and the CSF pleocytosis identified at the first presentation was finally correctly reinterpreted. In addition to those described, the patient reported other preceding episodes of visual loss diagnosed elsewhere as ONs and treated with intravenous steroid therapy followed by slow oral taper. There was no laboratory evidence suggestive of other autoimmune or infective ocular disease entities, nor a previous history of penetrating ocular trauma or surgery. According to revised diagnostic criteria for VKH disease (Read et al., 2001), a diagnosis of incomplete VKH was finally made. She was treated with oral steroid therapy, with partial edema resolution on a 3-months eye examination. A long-term treatment with Azathioprine was then started.

Fig. 3

Fundus photography of both eyes (optic nerve head field) performed during the last disease recurrence. Optic nerve head appears hyperemic and swollen in the right eye (a) as compared to the left eye (b) where the disc looks within normal limits

In order to support our diagnosis, a HLA haplotype typization was performed. However, HLA-DRB1*0405 allele was absent.

Discussion and conclusions

Here, we describe a case of VKH, whose diagnosis was done retrospectively due to the protean manifestations of this condition. The first presentations, including loss of vision accompanied by pain in the eye, suggested in fact ON [8] or posterior scleritis (PS) [9].

The first clinical episode was investigated in a neurological setting, with optic nerve head edema as solely clinical finding leading to high suspicion of ON as a Clinically Isolated Syndrome (CIS) pointing to a demyelinating disorder such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS) or, given the bilateral and exclusive involvement of the visual system, a Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) [10]; little attention was hence given to liquoral pleocytosis in the absence of OCBs, since both these findings were still compatible with a CNS demyelinating disease. According to the misdiagnosis, a suboptimal dose of steroid was administered at that time, which can at least partially explain the subsequent propensity for recurrence [11].

The second clinical episode was investigated by ophthalmologists. On that occasion clinical and instrumental findings (OCT, FA) could rise the suspicion of both a PS and a VKH [12, 13], but the absence of CSF pleocytosis (probably due to prior long-term steroid administration) did not support the latter hypothesis, which seemed also the less likely from a purely epidemiological point of view.

The third clinical episode manifested with polymorphic symptoms suggesting a VKH syndrome and the patient was evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting, so that the right diagnosis was made at a later disease stage using retrospective criteria.

The lack of communication between specialists operating in different medical fields can lead to a significant diagnostic delay, especially with rare multisystemic diseases. Crossing knowledge boundaries, which are often not clearly defined in such disorders, is essential to reach the goal of early diagnosis and treatment which, in turn, significantly affects prognosis, avoiding long-term complications such as severe iris depigmentation and persistent ocular hypotony, which have been described in South American patients [14].

VKH is a rare disease in Europe. In Switzerland, where the first patient was described by Vogt [5], VKH represents 0.7% of all uveitis [15]. Two studies from the North of Italy, where our hospital is located, report VKH as accounting for 1,37–4,1% of all uveitis (the former being a percentage even lower then the rest of Europe) [16, 17]. VKH is mostly seen (and thus, suspected) among patients of Asian origin. In China the highest percentage of panuveitis is reported [18], due to the high incidence of both VKH and Bechet disease (accounting respectively for 29–30% of all uveitis) [19]. In Japan VKH was considered the first cause of uveitis [18, 20], but differences in etiology of uveitis are being observed over time [21], and in most recent studies it is reported as the second cause of uveitis (7% of all uveitis) after sarcoidosis [22, 23]. On the other hand, higher VKH rates than expected are being recorded in South America: in Chile [24] VKH has been reported as the most frequent cause of uveitis, accounting for 17,2% of all uveitis, and in Argentina as the second cause after toxoplasmosis, accounting for 16.7% of all uveitis [18]. An epidemiologic study on uveitis conducted in Barcelona and highlighting the challenge of globalization in urban multiethnic populations reported a South American ethnicity in 47% of cases of VKH [25].

Ethnic groups do not only differ with respect to incidence and prevalence of the disease, but also for the frequency of clinical manifestations: Hispanic patients often present without extraocular symptoms in early phases of the disease [26], as we observed in this case, and they have globally lower rates of intertegumentary signs (between 11 and 16%) and hearing impairment (9%) compared to Asian patients [27]. On the other hand, neurological signs and dysacousia are quite common (74–76%) among Japanese patients [23, 28], while intertegumentary signs are more often seen in Chinese patients (39–41%) [29]. When looking at ocular manifestations, studies conducted on South American patients are concordant in rating a optic disc swelling occurrence significantly lower than in Asian patients (8,6% - 9% versus 50–73%, respectively) [26,27,28,29,30], but they differ in rating ERD (91% according to Sutavachtarin et al.... and 45,7% according to Giordano et al..) and anterior uveitis (100% according to Sutavachtarin et al. and 45,1% according to Giordano et al) [26, 30]. Response to therapy and complication rates are reported to be similar among ethnic groups [26].

Such epidemiological considerations have to be taken into account when performing a differential diagnosis. In our case, also the hypothesis of a NMOSD was considered, due the history of bilateral and recurrent ONs, but diagnostic criteria where not fulfilled [10]. Also NMOSDs have higher occurrence rates in Asian patients [31]. In South America NMOSDs have been reported to have a higher prevalence in non-white populations, while MS (which is another possible misdiagnosis in VKH patients, as recently described by Algathani et al) [32] has a higher prevalence in white South Americans [33].

The present case reinforces the notion that also in Western European countries, especially in urban multiethnic populations, rare etiologies of common symptoms have to be taken into account when performing a differential diagnosis.